Title |
A complete classification of epistatic two-locus models
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-9-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir, Debbie S Yuster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 8% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 26% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 55% |
Computer Science | 8 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,329,841
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#58
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,378
of 96,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them