↓ Skip to main content

Differences in the way a mammalian cell and yeast cells coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Differences in the way a mammalian cell and yeast cells coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression
Published in
BMC Biology, April 2003
DOI 10.1186/1475-4924-2-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Conlon, Martin Raff

Abstract

It is widely believed that cell-size checkpoints help to coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression, so that proliferating eukaryotic cells maintain their size. There is strong evidence for such size checkpoints in yeasts, which maintain a constant cell-size distribution as they proliferate, even though large yeast cells grow faster than small yeast cells. Moreover, when yeast cells are shifted to better or worse nutrient conditions, they alter their size threshold within one cell cycle. Populations of mammalian cells can also maintain a constant size distribution as they proliferate, but it is not known whether this depends on cell-size checkpoints. We show that proliferating rat Schwann cells do not require a cell-size checkpoint to maintain a constant cell-size distribution, as, unlike yeasts, large and small Schwann cells grow at the same rate, which depends on the concentration of extracellular growth factors. In addition, when shifted from serum-free to serum-containing medium, Schwann cells take many divisions to increase their size to that appropriate to the new condition, suggesting that they do not have cell-size checkpoints similar to those in yeasts. Proliferating Schwann cells and yeast cells seem to use different mechanisms to coordinate their growth with cell-cycle progression. Whereas yeast cells use cell-size checkpoints, Schwann cells apparently do not. It seems likely that many mammalian cells resemble Schwann cells in this respect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Israel 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 217 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 25%
Researcher 57 25%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor 18 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 20%
Chemistry 12 5%
Engineering 10 4%
Physics and Astronomy 8 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 26 11%