↓ Skip to main content

Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
11 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1359 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2009
DOI 10.1056/nejmsa0900592
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite a consensus that the use of health information technology should lead to more efficient, safer, and higher-quality care, there are no reliable estimates of the prevalence of adoption of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 51 4%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Canada 10 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Other 17 1%
Unknown 1256 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 255 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 180 13%
Researcher 159 12%
Student > Bachelor 99 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 78 6%
Other 304 22%
Unknown 284 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 309 23%
Computer Science 232 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 101 7%
Social Sciences 95 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 6%
Other 228 17%
Unknown 309 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2025.
All research outputs
#469,648
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#6,557
of 37,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,004
of 139,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#25
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.