↓ Skip to main content

Distinguishing human ethnic groups by means of sequences from Helicobacter pylori: Lessons from Ladakh

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distinguishing human ethnic groups by means of sequences from Helicobacter pylori: Lessons from Ladakh
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2004
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0306629101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Iceland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 141 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#10,678,245
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#78,921
of 119,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,835
of 90,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#454
of 735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.