↓ Skip to main content

Use of mammal manure by nesting burrowing owls: a test of four functional hypotheses

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Behaviour, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of mammal manure by nesting burrowing owls: a test of four functional hypotheses
Published in
Animal Behaviour, January 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.012
Authors

Matthew D. Smith, Courtney J. Conway

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Brazil 2 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 95 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 58%
Environmental Science 15 14%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2007.
All research outputs
#6,741,089
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Animal Behaviour
#2,672
of 6,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,541
of 168,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Behaviour
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.