You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toxicity of atmospheric aerosols on marine phytoplankton
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0811486106 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adina Paytan, Katherine R. M. Mackey, Ying Chen, Ivan D. Lima, Scott C. Doney, Natalie Mahowald, Rochelle Labiosa, Anton F. Post |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 378 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 22% |
Researcher | 85 | 21% |
Student > Master | 32 | 8% |
Professor | 25 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 6% |
Other | 64 | 16% |
Unknown | 80 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 100 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 90 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 19% |
Chemistry | 19 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
Other | 17 | 4% |
Unknown | 94 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#866,077
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13,791
of 103,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,040
of 107,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#56
of 765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.