↓ Skip to main content

Available, intuitive and free! Building e-learning modules using web 2.0 services

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Available, intuitive and free! Building e-learning modules using web 2.0 services
Published in
Medical Teacher, October 2012
DOI 10.3109/0142159x.2012.731105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Wah Michael Tam, Anne Eastwood

Abstract

E-learning is part of the mainstream in medical education and often provides the most efficient and effective means of engaging learners in a particular topic. However, translating design and content ideas into a useable product can be technically challenging, especially in the absence of information technology (IT) support. There is little published literature on the use of web 2.0 services to build e-learning activities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 82 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Other 10 11%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Social Sciences 14 15%
Computer Science 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,004,055
of 26,812,496 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#352
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,837
of 205,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,812,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.