↓ Skip to main content

Children with dyslexia lack multiple specializations along the visual word-form (VWF) system

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Children with dyslexia lack multiple specializations along the visual word-form (VWF) system
Published in
NeuroImage, May 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 255 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 60 22%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 99 36%
Neuroscience 31 11%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Linguistics 15 5%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 61 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2010.
All research outputs
#7,605,073
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#5,140
of 12,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,208
of 114,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#37
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.