↓ Skip to main content

Preterm infant massage therapy research: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Infant Behavior & Development, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,128)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
6 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
489 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preterm infant massage therapy research: A review
Published in
Infant Behavior & Development, April 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this paper, preterm infant massage therapy studies are reviewed. Massage therapy has led to weight gain in preterm infants when moderate pressure massage was provided. In studies on passive movement of the limbs, preterm infants also gained significantly more weight, and their bone density also increased. Research on ways of delivering the massage is also explored including using mothers versus therapists and the added effects of using oils. The use of mothers as therapists was effective in at least one study. The use of oils including coconut oil and safflower oil enhanced the average weight gain, and the transcutaneous absorption of oil also increased triglycerides. In addition, the use of synthetic oil increased vagal activity, which may indirectly contribute to weight gain. The weight gain was associated with shorter hospital stays and, thereby, significant hospital cost savings. Despite these benefits, preterm infant massage is only practiced in 38% of neonatal intensive care units. This may relate to the underlying mechanisms not being well understood. The increases noted in vagal activity, gastric motility, insulin and IGF-1 levels following moderate pressure massage are potential underlying mechanisms. However, those variables combined do not explain all of the variance in weight gain, highlighting the need for additional mechanism studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 476 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 15%
Student > Master 57 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 8%
Other 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 108 22%
Unknown 151 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 19%
Psychology 43 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Neuroscience 19 4%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 162 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2025.
All research outputs
#369,213
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Infant Behavior & Development
#22
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#912
of 147,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infant Behavior & Development
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.