↓ Skip to main content

Discordant results between conventional newborn screening and genomic sequencing in the BabySeq Project

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Discordant results between conventional newborn screening and genomic sequencing in the BabySeq Project
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, March 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41436-021-01146-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica H. Wojcik, Tian Zhang, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Casie A. Genetti, Matthew S. Lebo, Timothy W. Yu, Richard B. Parad, Ingrid A. Holm, Heidi L. Rehm, Alan H. Beggs, Robert C. Green, Pankaj B. Agrawal, Pankaj B. Agrawal, Alan H. Beggs, Wendi N. Betting, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Kurt D. Christensen, Dmitry Dukhovny, Shawn Fayer, Leslie A. Frankel, Casie A. Genetti, Chet Graham, Robert C. Green, Amanda M. Guiterrez, Maegan Harden, Ingrid A. Holm, Joel B. Krier, Matthew S. Lebo, Harvey L. Levy, Xingquan Lu, Kalotina Machini, Amy L. McGuire, Jaclyn B. Murry, Medha Naik, Tiffany T. Nguyen, Richard B. Parad, Hayley A. Peoples, Stacey Pereira, Devan Petersen, Uma Ramamurthy, Vivek Ramanathan, Heidi L. Rehm, Amy Roberts, Jill O. Robinson, Serguei Roumiantsev, Talia S. Schwartz, Tina K. Truong, Grace E. VanNoy, Susan E. Waisbren, Timothy W. Yu

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 31 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 37 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,292,779
of 27,303,603 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,079
of 3,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,118
of 461,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#41
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,303,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.