You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
高齢女性の下腿のデジタル画像による低骨格筋肉量判定の可能性 ―Convolutional Neural Network とエッジ検出を用いた分類による予備的研究―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Therapy Japan, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.15063/rigaku.11970 |
| Authors |
中口 拓真, 石本 泰星, 桑田 一記, 福本 祐真, 田津原 佑介, 近藤 義剛 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#77
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,945
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.