↓ Skip to main content

Regional asymmetry, obesity and gender determines tactile acuity of the knee regions: A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Manual Therapy, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regional asymmetry, obesity and gender determines tactile acuity of the knee regions: A cross-sectional study
Published in
Manual Therapy, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2016.08.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Alterations in central somatosensory function (e.g. cortical reorganisation) occurs secondary to chronic knee pain. The reorganization can be quantified using a clinical signatory measure, the two-point discrimination threshold (TPDT). In order to differentiate normal variability of TPDT against abnormal thresholds for clinical practice, development of body region specific reference values are required and the factors that determine the TPDT have to be established. To establish reference values for TPDT of the knee region in healthy individuals and to determine the factors that influence the TPDT of the knee regions. Participants across four decades (18-59 years; n = 79) were recruited. TPDT estimates for medial and lateral knee regions were determined using a mechanical calliper. Descriptive statistics, and linear regression analyses were performed to establish reference TPDT values, and to investigate associations between demographics, anthropometric variables, and TPDT estimates respectively. Participants' Mean (SD) age = 38.3 (12.2); females (n = 56); and right lower limb dominant (n = 72). Mean TPDT threshold ranges included: lateral right knee, 36.7 (14.3); medial right knee, 28.6 (9.7); lateral left knee, 37.7 (12.9); and medial left knee, 27.9 (11.4). Fifteen percent of the threshold variance (R2 = 0.148) of TPDT estimates was explained by the medial aspect (β = -8.9; p = 0.000) and male gender (β = 3.1; p = 0.057), weighted by anthropometric factors. Age-stratified knee TPDT estimates have been reported to aid clinical interpretation. Regional asymmetry, gender, and obesity indices are factors that determine the TPDT of the knee. Normal TPDT asymmetry observed at medial aspect of the knee has significantly greater acuity compared to the lateral knee.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 29 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,676,559
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Manual Therapy
#393
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,581
of 315,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Manual Therapy
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.