↓ Skip to main content

The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, January 2012
DOI 10.1037/a0027822
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 7%
Netherlands 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Unknown 78 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Researcher 13 15%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 48%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,492,769
of 34,593,328 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#1,992
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,873
of 305,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#38
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,593,328 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.