↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Age-Related Cognitive Change and Targets for Intervention: Social Interactions and Stress

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of Age-Related Cognitive Change and Targets for Intervention: Social Interactions and Stress
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, May 2012
DOI 10.1093/gerona/gls125
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The effects of biological and physical factors on cognitive aging are widely studied. Less is known about the role of psychosocial factors such as stress and social relationships for cognitive functioning.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,808,642
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#1,616
of 4,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,819
of 212,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.