↓ Skip to main content

The Pediatric Nephrology Workforce Crisis: A Call to Action

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
51 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Pediatric Nephrology Workforce Crisis: A Call to Action
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, March 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isa Ashoor, Darcy Weidemann, Ewa Elenberg, Susan Halbach, Lyndsay Harshman, Alexander Kula, John D. Mahan, Arwa Nada, Alejandro Quiroga, Allison Redpath Mahon, Jodi Smith, Michael Somers, Patrick D. Brophy, ASPN Workforce Summit Action Groups, Allison Redpath Mahon, Lyndsay Harshman, Adam Weinstein, Isa Ashoor, Kathy Lee-Son, Roshan George, Melissa Muff-Luett, Christine Sethna, Kumail Merchant, Shina Menon, Jillian Warejko, Sai Sudha, Darcy Weidemann, Alejandro Quiroga, Patrick Brophy, Danielle Soranno, Rita Sheth, Keri Drake, Alexander Kula, Arwa Nada, John D. Mahan, Sandeep Riar, Rebecca Lombel, Sudha Garimella, Susan Halbach, Ewa Elenberg, Elaine Kamil, Patricia Seo-Mayer, Kartik Pillutla

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Unknown 14 67%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 13 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2025.
All research outputs
#1,240,172
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#574
of 15,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,277
of 482,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#5
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.