↓ Skip to main content

Exploratory Space-Time Analyses of Rift Valley Fever in South Africa in 2008–2011

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploratory Space-Time Analyses of Rift Valley Fever in South Africa in 2008–2011
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001808
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a zoonotic arbovirosis for which the primary hosts are domestic livestock (cattle, sheep and goats). RVF was first described in South Africa in 1950-1951. Mechanisms for short and long distance transmission have been hypothesised, but there is little supporting evidence. Here we describe RVF occurrence and spatial distribution in South Africa in 2008-11, and investigate the presence of a contagious process in order to generate hypotheses on the different mechanisms of transmission.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Kenya 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 11%
Mathematics 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#11,075,031
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#5,672
of 10,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,903
of 221,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#59
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.