↓ Skip to main content

The role of the tissue factor pathway in haemostasis and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in hematology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of the tissue factor pathway in haemostasis and beyond
Published in
Current opinion in hematology, September 2016
DOI 10.1097/moh.0000000000000268
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The role of tissue factor (TF) in the initiation of the blood coagulation network leading to generation of a fibrin clot has been well defined over the past 50 years. Although much is known about this sequence of events and its regulation, many important questions remain unresolved. More recently, a complex role for TF in cellular processes independent of fibrin generation has emerged. This review summarizes some of the advances in this field. TF is the cellular receptor and cofactor for factor VII/VIIa; however, controversy still surrounds expression of TF within the vasculature, the role of circulating microvesicle pools of TF and mechanisms of 'encryption' of TF activity. However, there have been significant advances in the role of TF-initiated cell signalling. Lastly, an alternatively spliced TF transcript has been identified and some insights into its role in cancer cell metastasis/proliferation have been elucidated. Understanding of TF structure function has increased substantially; however, multiple controversies still surround some aspects of its regulation. TF has emerged as a pivotal player in orchestrating not only fibrin generation but wound repair. Derangement of these repair processes contributes significantly to the pathophysiology of a number of disease processes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#23,298,365
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in hematology
#829
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,140
of 337,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in hematology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.