↓ Skip to main content

A Streamlined Method for Detecting Structural Variants in Cancer Genomes by Short Read Paired-End Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Streamlined Method for Detecting Structural Variants in Cancer Genomes by Short Read Paired-End Sequencing
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048314
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Defining the architecture of a specific cancer genome, including its structural variants, is essential for understanding tumor biology, mechanisms of oncogenesis, and for designing effective personalized therapies. Short read paired-end sequencing is currently the most sensitive method for detecting somatic mutations that arise during tumor development. However, mapping structural variants using this method leads to a large number of false positive calls, mostly due to the repetitive nature of the genome and the difficulty of assigning correct mapping positions to short reads. This study describes a method to efficiently identify large tumor-specific deletions, inversions, duplications and translocations from low coverage data using SVDetect or BreakDancer software and a set of novel filtering procedures designed to reduce false positive calls. Applying our method to a spontaneous T cell lymphoma arising in a core RAG2/p53-deficient mouse, we identified 40 validated tumor-specific structural rearrangements supported by as few as 2 independent read pairs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 21%
Computer Science 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 3 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,441,328
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,210
of 224,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,295
of 244,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#882
of 5,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.