You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic Consequence Analysis of the ARkStorm Scenario
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards Review, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000173 |
Authors |
Ian Sue Wing, Adam Z. Rose, Anne M. Wein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#146,835
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards Review
#2
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,545
of 269,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them