| Title |
The Fast Track FIT study: diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin in patients with suspected colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James L Turvill, Daniel Turnock, Dan Cottingham, Monica Haritakis, Laura Jeffery, Annabelle Girdwood, Tom Hearfield, Alex Mitchell, Ada Keding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 52% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,569,268
of 25,217,627 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#753
of 4,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,043
of 433,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#26
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,217,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.