We reviewed the revision rate and functional outcome of all patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after an osteotomy or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) on the New Zealand Joint Registry. We used these data to compare the results with primary TKA scores, including comparison of age-matched subgroups. There were 711 patients who had undergone TKA as salvage for a failed osteotomy with a revision rate of 1.33 per 100 component years and a mean 6-month Oxford Knee Score (OKS) of 36.9. There were 205 patients who had a failed UKA converted to TKA with a revision rate of 1.97 per 100 component years and a mean OKS of 29.1. The revision rates of TKA for both failed osteotomy and failed UKA were significantly poorer than after primary TKA (0.48 per 100 component years). The mean OKS after revision of a UKA was significantly poorer than both primary TKA and TKA for a failed osteotomy. There was no significant difference in mean OKS between primary TKA and TKA for a failed osteotomy, even among patients younger than 65 years. Revision of a failed osteotomy to a TKA has improved functional results compared with revision of a failed UKA. However, both yield poorer survivorship rates compared with primary TKA.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#2,917
of 4,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,816
of 191,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
