↓ Skip to main content

Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
3623 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
Nature, October 2012
DOI 10.1038/nature11582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke Jostins, Stephan Ripke, Rinse K. Weersma, Richard H. Duerr, Dermot P. McGovern, Ken Y. Hui, James C. Lee, L. Philip Schumm, Yashoda Sharma, Carl A. Anderson, Jonah Essers, Mitja Mitrovic, Kaida Ning, Isabelle Cleynen, Emilie Theatre, Sarah L. Spain, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Philippe Goyette, Zhi Wei, Clara Abraham, Jean-Paul Achkar, Tariq Ahmad, Leila Amininejad, Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, Vibeke Andersen, Jane M. Andrews, Leonard Baidoo, Tobias Balschun, Peter A. Bampton, Alain Bitton, Gabrielle Boucher, Stephan Brand, Carsten Büning, Ariella Cohain, Sven Cichon, Mauro D’Amato, Dirk De Jong, Kathy L. Devaney, Marla Dubinsky, Cathryn Edwards, David Ellinghaus, Lynnette R. Ferguson, Denis Franchimont, Karin Fransen, Richard Gearry, Michel Georges, Christian Gieger, Jürgen Glas, Talin Haritunians, Ailsa Hart, Chris Hawkey, Matija Hedl, Xinli Hu, Tom H. Karlsen, Limas Kupcinskas, Subra Kugathasan, Anna Latiano, Debby Laukens, Ian C. Lawrance, Charlie W. Lees, Edouard Louis, Gillian Mahy, John Mansfield, Angharad R. Morgan, Craig Mowat, William Newman, Orazio Palmieri, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen, Uros Potocnik, Natalie J. Prescott, Miguel Regueiro, Jerome I. Rotter, Richard K. Russell, Jeremy D. Sanderson, Miquel Sans, Jack Satsangi, Stefan Schreiber, Lisa A. Simms, Jurgita Sventoraityte, Stephan R. Targan, Kent D. Taylor, Mark Tremelling, Hein W. Verspaget, Martine De Vos, Cisca Wijmenga, David C. Wilson, Juliane Winkelmann, Ramnik J. Xavier, Sebastian Zeissig, Bin Zhang, Clarence K. Zhang, Hongyu Zhao, Mark S. Silverberg, Vito Annese, Hakon Hakonarson, Steven R. Brant, Graham Radford-Smith, Christopher G. Mathew, John D. Rioux, Eric E. Schadt, Mark J. Daly, Andre Franke, Miles Parkes, Severine Vermeire, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Judy H Cho

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,623 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 37 1%
United Kingdom 20 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 3512 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 672 19%
Researcher 583 16%
Student > Master 371 10%
Student > Bachelor 340 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 172 5%
Other 533 15%
Unknown 952 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 779 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 653 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 532 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 260 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 70 2%
Other 289 8%
Unknown 1040 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2026.
All research outputs
#277,083
of 34,344,963 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,425
of 117,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,243
of 245,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#99
of 1,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,344,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.