Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions

Overview of attention for article published in Spine, April 2021

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet

twitter: 6 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 48 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 X posts from 6 X users, with an upper bound of 16,196 followers.

Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided vs Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions https://t.co/2tfwc6DKun via @doximity

Pub ahead of print: more emerging literature in support of MIS robotic guided spinal fusion. This from the MIS ReFRESH Study. From .@UMiamiHealth Read it here: https://t.co/roBtYYMczj .@NASSspine .@ISASSorg .@ForSpine .@EUROSPINESoc .@SPINE_20 .@LSRSsp…

RT @SpineWebJournal: Pub ahead of print: Results of one of the first large scale multi center studies on MIS robotic vs standard fusions. F…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 3 additional X posts.