↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the Value of a Clinical Practice Guideline for Children With Perforated Appendicitis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measuring the Value of a Clinical Practice Guideline for Children With Perforated Appendicitis
Published in
Annals of Surgery, July 2017
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000001946
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,329,951
of 34,568,501 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#4,743
of 11,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,295
of 360,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#75
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,568,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.