↓ Skip to main content

The prognostic accuracy of resonance frequency analysis in predicting failure risk of immediately restored implants

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Implants Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The prognostic accuracy of resonance frequency analysis in predicting failure risk of immediately restored implants
Published in
Clinical Oral Implants Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1111/clr.12057
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is of imperative clinical significance to define a safe threshold for planned immediate implant restoration. The aim of this report was to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements recorded at two different times (implant placement and 8-week post-implant placement) and to determine the optimal threshold value for predicting failure risk of immediately restored/loaded implants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 59%
Materials Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 33 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2012.
All research outputs
#19,990,545
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Implants Research
#881
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,670
of 190,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Implants Research
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.