↓ Skip to main content

A Neural Model for Temporal Order Judgments and Their Active Recalibration: A Common Mechanism for Space and Time?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Neural Model for Temporal Order Judgments and Their Active Recalibration: A Common Mechanism for Space and Time?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00470
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When observers experience a constant delay between their motor actions and sensory feedback, their perception of the temporal order between actions and sensations adapt (Stetson et al., 2006). We present here a novel neural model that can explain temporal order judgments (TOJs) and their recalibration. Our model employs three ubiquitous features of neural systems: (1) information pooling, (2) opponent processing, and (3) synaptic scaling. Specifically, the model proposes that different populations of neurons encode different delays between motor-sensory events, the outputs of these populations feed into rivaling neural populations (encoding "before" and "after"), and the activity difference between these populations determines the perceptual judgment. As a consequence of synaptic scaling of input weights, motor acts which are consistently followed by delayed sensory feedback will cause the network to recalibrate its point of subjective simultaneity. The structure of our model raises the possibility that recalibration of TOJs is a temporal analog to the motion aftereffect (MAE). In other words, identical neural mechanisms may be used to make perceptual determinations about both space and time. Our model captures behavioral recalibration results for different numbers of adapting trials and different adapting delays. In line with predictions of the model, we additionally demonstrate that temporal recalibration can last through time, in analogy to storage of the MAE.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 104 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 47%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,463,695
of 32,023,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,908
of 40,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,878
of 289,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#277
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,023,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.