↓ Skip to main content

マインドフルネスは有害な行動にむすびつくか?――マインドフルネスと能動的攻撃の関連に対する危害/ケアの調整効果

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Personality, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 295)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
598 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
マインドフルネスは有害な行動にむすびつくか?――マインドフルネスと能動的攻撃の関連に対する危害/ケアの調整効果
Published in
Japanese Journal of Personality, April 2021
DOI 10.2132/personality.30.1.1
Authors

砂田 安秀, 杉浦 義典

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 598 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 479. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#56,794
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Personality
#1
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,961
of 458,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Personality
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them