You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ordinary lives behind extraordinary occupations: on the uses of Rubicon for a social history of American intelligence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1080/09557571.2021.1892592 |
| Authors |
Pauline Blistène |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,001,685
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#103
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,933
of 453,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.