↓ Skip to main content

How helophytes influence the phosphorus cycle in degraded inundated peat soils – Implications for fen restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Engineering, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How helophytes influence the phosphorus cycle in degraded inundated peat soils – Implications for fen restoration
Published in
Ecological Engineering, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.003
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 35%
Environmental Science 15 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2025.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Engineering
#579
of 1,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,842
of 246,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Engineering
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.