↓ Skip to main content

In Search of a Germ Theory Equivalent for Chronic Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In Search of a Germ Theory Equivalent for Chronic Disease
Published in
Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, May 2012
DOI 10.5888/pcd9.110301
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The fight against infectious disease advanced dramatically with the consolidation of the germ theory in the 19th century. This focus on a predominant cause of infections (ie, microbial pathogens) ultimately led to medical and public health advances (eg, immunization, pasteurization, antibiotics). However, the resulting declines in infections in the 20th century were matched by a rise in chronic, noncommunicable diseases, for which there is no single underlying etiology. The discovery of a form of low-grade systemic and chronic inflammation ("metaflammation"), linked to inducers (broadly termed "anthropogens") associated with modern man-made environments and lifestyles, suggests an underlying basis for chronic disease that could provide a 21st-century equivalent of the germ theory.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2026.
All research outputs
#907,944
of 34,675,792 outputs
Outputs from Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy
#215
of 2,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,945
of 213,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,675,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.