↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tedizolid activity against a multicentre worldwide collection of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from patients with pneumonia (2017–2019)
Published in
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, April 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The antimicrobial activity of tedizolid and comparators was evaluated against a large worldwide collection of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates recovered from patients with pneumonia. Clinical isolates were collected from patients in 96 medical centers in the Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and United States during 2017-2019 and tested for susceptibility by reference broth microdilution. The most active agents against S. aureus (n = 4,667) were tedizolid (100.0% susceptible), linezolid (100.0% susceptible), ceftaroline (96.2% susceptible), and vancomycin (100.0% susceptible), but only tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin retained activity against >95% of MRSA isolates from all regions. In general, linezolid, ceftriaxone, ceftaroline, levofloxacin, penicillin, and vancomycin showed susceptibility rates >95% against S. pneumoniae (n = 3,008). However, only linezolid, ceftaroline, levofloxacin, and vancomycin remained active (>95% susceptibility) against isolates displaying penicillin-nonsusceptible or multidrug resistant phenotypes. Penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae isolates were less frequently recovered from patients <5 years-old compared to other age groups. The in vitro data presented here confirm the high potency of tedizolid against S. aureus and S. pneumoniae causing pneumonia worldwide and support further clinical evaluations of tedizolid for treating pneumonia caused by these pathogens.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Unknown 19 70%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#22,422,860
of 32,444,503 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#3,829
of 5,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,416
of 470,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#159
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,444,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.