You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Population-scale tissue transcriptomics maps long non-coding RNAs to complex disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivia M. de Goede, Daniel C. Nachun, Nicole M. Ferraro, Michael J. Gloudemans, Abhiram S. Rao, Craig Smail, Tiffany Y. Eulalio, François Aguet, Bernard Ng, Jishu Xu, Alvaro N. Barbeira, Stephane E. Castel, Sarah Kim-Hellmuth, YoSon Park, Alexandra J. Scott, Benjamin J. Strober, GTEx Consortium, Shankara Anand, Stacey Gabriel, Gad A. Getz, Aaron Graubert, Kane Hadley, Robert E. Handsaker, Katherine H. Huang, Xiao Li, Daniel G. MacArthur, Samuel R. Meier, Jared L. Nedzel, Duyen T. Nguyen, Ayellet V. Segrè, Ellen Todres, Brunilda Balliu, Rodrigo Bonazzola, Andrew Brown, Donald F. Conrad, Daniel J. Cotter, Nancy Cox, Sayantan Das, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Jonah Einson, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Eleazar Eskin, Elise D. Flynn, Laure Fresard, Eric R. Gamazon, Diego Garrido-Martín, Nicole R. Gay, Roderic Guigó, Andrew R. Hamel, Yuan He, Paul J. Hoffman, Farhad Hormozdiari, Lei Hou, Brian Jo, Silva Kasela, Seva Kashin, Manolis Kellis, Alan Kwong, Xin Li, Yanyu Liang, Serghei Mangul, Pejman Mohammadi, Manuel Muñoz-Aguirre, Andrew B. Nobel, Meritxell Oliva, Yongjin Park, Princy Parsana, Ferran Reverter, John M. Rouhana, Chiara Sabatti, Ashis Saha, Matthew Stephens, Barbara E. Stranger, Nicole A. Teran, Ana Viñuela, Gao Wang, Fred Wright, Valentin Wucher, Yuxin Zou, Pedro G. Ferreira, Li, Marta Melé, Esti Yeger-Lotem, Debra Bradbury, Tanya Krubit, Jeffrey A. McLean, Liqun Qi, Karna Robinson, Nancy V. Roche, Anna M. Smith, David E. Tabor, Anita Undale, Jason Bridge, Lori E. Brigham, Barbara A. Foster, Bryan M. Gillard, Richard Hasz, Marcus Hunter, Christopher Johns, Mark Johnson, Ellen Karasik, Gene Kopen, William F. Leinweber, Alisa McDonald, Michael T. Moser, Kevin Myer, Kimberley D. Ramsey, Brian Roe, Saboor Shad, Jeffrey A. Thomas, Gary Walters, Michael Washington, Joseph Wheeler, Scott D. Jewell, Daniel C. Rohrer, Dana R. Valley, David A. Davis, Deborah C. Mash, Mary E. Barcus, Philip A. Branton, Leslie Sobin, Laura K. Barker, Heather M. Gardiner, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura A. Siminoff, Paul Flicek, Maximilian Haeussler, Thomas Juettemann, W. James Kent, Christopher M. Lee, Conner C. Powell, Kate R. Rosenbloom, Magali Ruffier, Dan Sheppard, Kieron Taylor, Stephen J. Trevanion, Daniel R. Zerbino, Nathan S. Abell, Joshua Akey, Lin Chen, Kathryn Demanelis, Jennifer A. Doherty, Andrew P. Feinberg, Kasper D. Hansen, Peter F. Hickey, Farzana Jasmine, Lihua Jiang, Rajinder Kaul, Muhammad G. Kibriya, Jin Billy Li, Qin Li, Shin Lin, Sandra E. Linder, Brandon L. Pierce, Lindsay F. Rizzardi, Andrew D. Skol, Kevin S. Smith, Michael Snyder, John Stamatoyannopoulos, Hua Tang, Meng Wang, Latarsha J. Carithers, Ping Guan, Susan E. Koester, A. Roger Little, Helen M. Moore, Concepcion R. Nierras, Abhi K. Rao, Jimmie B. Vaught, Simona Volpi, Christopher D. Brown, Xiaoquan Wen, Ira M. Hall, Alexis Battle, Tuuli Lappalainen, Hae Kyung Im, Kristin G. Ardlie, Sara Mostafavi, Thomas Quertermous, Karla Kirkegaard, Stephen B. Montgomery |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| Germany | 6 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 57% |
| Scientists | 53 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 285 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 92 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 91 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 98 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#645,070
of 34,408,222 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#3,131
of 19,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,691
of 464,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#83
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,408,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.