Length of hospital stay is a quality metric in joint arthroplasty. Rapid recovery protocols have safely reduced the average length of hospitalization, but it is unclear whether there is a difference in complication and readmission rates between patients discharged the day of surgery or on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). We calculated 30-day complication and readmission after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) based on day of discharge. We then analyzed the rapid recovery group by comparing those discharged the day of surgery and those discharged on POD 1.
Patients undergoing joint arthroplasty between 2011 and 2013 were selected from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complication and readmission were determined based on discharge date. Propensity-matched comparisons were performed between patients discharged POD 0 vs POD 1. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine independent risk factors for 30-day complication and readmission.
There was no difference in complication or readmission after TKA or UKA between POD 0 or POD 1 discharge. In the propensity-matched cohort in THA, however, there was an increased rate of any complication in the POD 0 compared with the POD 1 discharge cohort. Risk factors for complication and readmission among THA, TKA, and UKA include age >80 years and smoking, and discharge after day 3.
Increased length of stay is associated with increased complication and readmission after joint arthroplasty for patients with a hospital stay of 3 or more days. However, in THA, there was an increased complication rate in patients discharged POD 0 as compared to POD 1. Efforts to improve patient selection are expected to reduce short-term complications after outpatient joint arthroplasty. Further research is needed to determine which patients can be discharged POD 0 without increased complication after THA.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,447,651
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#347
of 4,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,138
of 380,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
