↓ Skip to main content

The Emerging Role of Simulation Education to Achieve Patient Safety Translating Deliberate Practice and Debriefing to Save Lives

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric clinics of North America, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Emerging Role of Simulation Education to Achieve Patient Safety Translating Deliberate Practice and Debriefing to Save Lives
Published in
Pediatric clinics of North America, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Simulation-based educational processes are emerging as key tools for assessing and improving patient safety. Multidisciplinary or interprofessional simulation training can be used to optimize crew resource management and safe communication principles. There is good evidence that simulation training improves self-confidence, knowledge, and individual and team performance on manikins. Emerging evidence supports that procedural simulation, deliberate practice, and debriefing can also improve operational performance in clinical settings and can result in safer patient and population/system outcomes in selected settings. This article highlights emerging evidence that shows how simulation-based interventions and education contribute to safer, more efficient systems of care that save lives.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 136 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Researcher 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 37 26%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,129,357
of 27,520,826 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric clinics of North America
#1,001
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,650
of 295,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric clinics of North America
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,520,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.