You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Novel Framework to Predict Relative Habitat Selection in Aquatic Systems: Applying Machine Learning and Resource Selection Functions to Acoustic Telemetry Data From Multiple Shark Species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2021.631262 |
| Authors |
Lucas P. Griffin, Grace A. Casselberry, Kristen M. Hart, Adrian Jordaan, Sarah L. Becker, Ashleigh J. Novak, Bryan M. DeAngelis, Clayton G. Pollock, Ian Lundgren, Zandy Hillis-Starr, Andy J. Danylchuk, Gregory B. Skomal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,347,526
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,578
of 10,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,005
of 433,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#107
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.