↓ Skip to main content

Constructing a framework for quality activity in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Health Review, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Constructing a framework for quality activity in primary care
Published in
Australian Health Review, November 2012
DOI 10.1071/ah11097
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2009, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners commissioned the development of a framework to facilitate quality-improvement activity in primary care settings. This paper outlines the development of the framework, which integrates concepts of quality with the reality of practice-based clinical care, and discusses its value for primary care quality improvement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 41%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,693,701
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Australian Health Review
#1,033
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,978
of 209,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Health Review
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.