↓ Skip to main content

How accurately can we assess zoonotic risk?

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
141 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How accurately can we assess zoonotic risk?
Published in
PLoS Biology, April 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 56 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 61 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2025.
All research outputs
#298,011
of 34,567,073 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#513
of 7,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,928
of 480,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#14
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,567,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.