You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The End of the Backsliding Paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Democracy, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1353/jod.2021.0001 |
| Authors |
Licia Cianetti, Seán Hanley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 34 | 51% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,339,649
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Democracy
#345
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,573
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Democracy
#37
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.