↓ Skip to main content

CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Cell Biology, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
91 patents

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint
Published in
Nature Cell Biology, July 2000
DOI 10.1038/35019518
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Here we show that suppression of synthesis of the microtubule motor CENP-E (centromere-associated protein E), a component of the kinetochore corona fibres of mammalian centromeres, yields chromosomes that are chronically mono-orientated, with spindles that are flattened along the plane of the substrate. Despite apparently normal microtubule numbers and the continued presence at kinetochores of other microtubule motors, spindle poles fragment in the absence of CENP-E, which implicates this protein in delivery of components from kinetochores to poles. CENP-E represents a link between attachment of spindle microtubules and the mitotic checkpoint signalling cascade, as depletion of this motor leads to profound checkpoint activation, whereas immunoprecipitation reveals a nearly stoichiometric association of CENP-E with the checkpoint kinase BubR1 during mitosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 28%
Researcher 34 25%
Professor 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 36%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,006,856
of 30,990,086 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#1,540
of 4,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,245
of 50,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,990,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.