You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Authors’ Reply to Letter to the Editor: Continued improvement to genetic diversity indicator for CBD
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Genetics, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10592-021-01359-w |
Authors |
Linda Laikre, Paul A. Hohenlohe, Fred W. Allendorf, Laura D. Bertola, Martin F. Breed, Michael W. Bruford, W. Chris Funk, Gonzalo Gajardo, Antonio González-Rodríguez, Catherine E. Grueber, Philip W. Hedrick, Myriam Heuertz, Margaret E. Hunter, Kerstin Johannesson, Libby Liggins, Anna J. MacDonald, Joachim Mergeay, Farideh Moharrek, David O’Brien, Rob Ogden, Pablo Orozco-terWengel, Clarisse Palma-Silva, Jennifer Pierson, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Isa-Rita M. Russo, Nils Ryman, Gernot Segelbacher, Per Sjögren-Gulve, Lisette P. Waits, Cristiano Vernesi, Sean Hoban |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
Australia | 3 | 7% |
New Zealand | 3 | 7% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Isle of Man | 1 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 21% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 60% |
Scientists | 15 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,551,270
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#75
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,656
of 456,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.