You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
1型糖尿病を有する広汎型侵襲性歯周炎患者に対して包括的歯周治療を行った10年経過症例
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.2329/perio.62.16 |
Authors |
松本 ゆみ, 新井 英雄 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi
#91
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,926
of 395,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them