↓ Skip to main content

Referents or Role Models? The Self-Efficacy and Job Performance Effects of Perceiving Higher Performing Peers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Referents or Role Models? The Self-Efficacy and Job Performance Effects of Perceiving Higher Performing Peers
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, March 2021
DOI 10.1037/apl0000519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Master 16 6%
Lecturer 14 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Student > Bachelor 11 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 150 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 61 23%
Psychology 17 6%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 148 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,148,281
of 28,623,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#652
of 3,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,713
of 460,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,623,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.