↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Using Red-Topped - Non-Additive-Containing - Collecting Tube in Diagnosing Pseudohyperkalemia in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cureus Journal of Medical Science, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Role of Using Red-Topped - Non-Additive-Containing - Collecting Tube in Diagnosing Pseudohyperkalemia in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published in
Cureus Journal of Medical Science, March 2021
DOI 10.7759/cureus.14074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Abdulrahim, Mohamedanwar Ghandour, Abu-Bekr Mohamed, Lobelia Samavati

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#31,230,605
of 34,412,533 outputs
Outputs from Cureus Journal of Medical Science
#31,265
of 38,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#421,812
of 481,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cureus Journal of Medical Science
#745
of 915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,412,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.