A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing second‐generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, July 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 22 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing second‐generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation
Published in	Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, July 2020
DOI	10.1111/jce.14676
Pubmed ID	32671920
Authors	Venkatesh Ravi, Abhushan Poudyal, Priyanjali Pulipati, Timothy Larsen, Kousik Krishnan, Richard G. Trohman, Parikshit S. Sharma, Henry D. Huang

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	22	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Bachelor	3	14%
Other	2	9%
Researcher	2	9%
Professor	1	5%
Professor > Associate Professor	1	5%
Other	1	5%
Unknown	12	55%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	8	36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	1	5%
Nursing and Health Professions	1	5%
Unknown	12	55%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.

All research outputs

#5,889,368

of 26,966,971 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

#640

of 3,018 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#130,232

of 433,861 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

#23

of 71 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 26,966,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.