↓ Skip to main content

Complement-Regulatory Proteins CFHR1 and CFHR3 and Patient Response to Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Complement-Regulatory Proteins CFHR1 and CFHR3 and Patient Response to Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, February 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1275
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies, including rituximab and obinutuzumab (GA101) are common treatments for follicular lymphoma (FL). In an effort to better understand the role of complement in mAb action, we recently performed germline SNP profiling on 142 FL patients and found rs3766404 genotype correlated with patient response to rituximab. To assess the role of three SNP-associated complement regulatory proteins (CFH, CFHR1 and CFHR3) in clinical response to anti-CD20 mAb, we studied two cohorts of patients treated with anti-CD20 mAb. Cohorts included the Iowa/Mayo Lymphoma SPORE observational cohort of subjects with a new diagnosis of FL treated with rituximab, and the GAUSS prospective randomized trial cohort of FL subjects randomized to receive single agent rituximab or obinutuzumab. Circulating protein expression was measured for CFH, CFHR1 and CFHR3 and correlated to clinical outcome. rs3766404 genotype correlated with expression of the related downstream genes CFHR1 and CFHR3. Loss of CFHR1 expression correlated with inferior patient outcome in the observational cohort, but not in the GAUSS cohort. Loss of CFHR3 correlated with superior event-free survival in GAUSS subjects treated with obinutuzumab, but not rituximab. We conclude that the relationship between complement regulatory proteins CFHR1 and CFHR3 and response to anti-CD20 mAb therapy varies based on the specific anti-CD20 mAb used. We propose that CFHR3 is a candidate biomarker for obinutuzumab response. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to better understand how complement pathways and complement regulatory proteins impact on the efficacy of anti-CD20 mAb therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Other 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#28,565,680
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#16,675
of 17,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380,660
of 479,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#172
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.