↓ Skip to main content

What can Autism and Dyslexia Tell us about Intelligence?

Overview of attention for article published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What can Autism and Dyslexia Tell us about Intelligence?
Published in
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, January 2008
DOI 10.1080/17470210701508806
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper argues that understanding developmental disorders requires developing theories and models that explicitly represent the role of general intelligence in the cognitive phenotype of the disorder. In the case of autism it is argued that the low-IQ scores of people with autism are not likely to be due to a deficit in the cognitive process that is arguably the major cause of mental retardation - namely, speed of processing - but rather low IQ reflects the pervasive and cascading effects of the deficit in the information-processing module that causes autism. In the case of dyslexia, two radically different models of reading disorder (ability = disability and a modular deficit model) are likely to be influenced by the effect of general intelligence on reading performance in ways that will remain unclear without an explicit model of how general intelligence influences reading.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Professor 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
#1,083
of 1,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,399
of 168,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.