Title |
Diagnostic et traitement de l’adénomyose
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.201607-f |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ebernella Shirin Dason, Crystal Chan, Mara Sobel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,933,848
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,270
of 9,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,837
of 455,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#47
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.