↓ Skip to main content

DIS3 mutations in multiple myeloma impact the transcriptional signature and clinical outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Haematologica, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DIS3 mutations in multiple myeloma impact the transcriptional signature and clinical outcome
Published in
Haematologica, May 2021
DOI 10.3324/haematol.2021.278342
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

DIS3 gene mutations (DIS3mts) occur in roughly 10% of multiple myeloma (MM) patients; furthermore, DIS3 expression could be affected by monosomy 13 or del(13q), which occur in approximately 40% of MM cases. Despite several reports on the prevalence of DIS3mts, their contribution to the pathobiology of MM remains largely unknown. We took advantage of the large public CoMMpass dataset to investigate the spectrum of DIS3mts in MM and its impact on the transcriptome and clinical outcome. We found that DIS3mts clinical relevance strictly depended on del(13q) co-occurrence. In particular, bi-allelic DIS3 lesions significantly affected PFS, independently from other predictors of poor clinical outcome, while mono-allelic events mostly impacted OS. As expected, DIS3mts affect MM transcriptome involving cellular processes and signaling pathways associated with RNA metabolism, and the deregulation of a large number of lncRNAs, among which we identified five distinct transcripts as independent predictors of poorer OS and nine of worse PFS, some of which (AC015982.2 and AL445228.3) predicting both. These findings strongly prompt further studies investigating the relevance of these lncRNAs in MM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 32 62%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 33 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2024.
All research outputs
#8,450,778
of 31,694,551 outputs
Outputs from Haematologica
#2,256
of 5,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,504
of 469,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Haematologica
#22
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,694,551 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.