| Title |
Navigating possible endometriosis in primary care: a qualitative study of GP perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Dixon, Abigail McNiven, Amelia Talbot, Lisa Hinton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 62% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#431,194
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#170
of 4,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,302
of 456,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.