You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The changes in species composition mediate direct effects of climate change on future fire regimes of boreal forests in northeastern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13876 |
| Authors |
Chao Huang, Hong S. He, Yu Liang, Todd J. Hawbaker, Paul D. Henne, Wenru Xu, Peng Gong, Zhiliang Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,616
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,882
of 434,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#50
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.